Senator’s Goalies, Starter vs Backup

Senator goalies

I’m going to start this off by saying I hate the fact that Anton Forsberg only gets the nod in net every tenth game or so in recent months. In my humble opinion, (I’m no coach) you should only have the starter/backup designation when one goalie is outperforming the other. The Senator’s goalies are fairly equal in performance, age, and even (somewhat) salary. It seems to be common practice in the playoffs that if one goalie is “hot” you stick with them. I understand that theory but you have to get to the playoffs first. So, what is the reason behind one of the Senator’s goalies being favoured over the other?

This post was drafted before the win against Buffalo; the stats were updated to accommodate the changes the next day. 

Performance

While Joonas Korpisalo appears to be the starting goalie and Forsberg the backup, (based on the number of games played) their performance records are very similar. Both have had great games recently and both have had stinkers. It’s difficult and unfair to say one is better than the other. 

source

An even better indicator of performance is the xG or expected goals against. This statistic is an indicator of which shots were of high-quality scoring chances. Think breakaways, screened shots, rebounds etc. 

For example, this is the xG for Korpisalo’s last game (vs New Jersey, and admittedly, one of his worst)

…and this is Forsberg’s from (one of his best) the most recent win vs Buffalo:

While it’s not fair to compare one goalie’s bad game to the other’s good game, one can see how the shots’ ratings affect the statistics. Moneypuck reports Korpisalo’s total xG as -5.9 for his 21 games and Forsberg’s total xG as -8.1 for his 13 games. Sadly, neither are great

Salary and Age

Perhaps the decision is based on the salary the team is forking out, ie slightly more for Korpisalo (4 million) than Forsberg (2.75 million). It cannot be their age difference as they are pretty close in that respect as well (soon to be 30, and just turned 31, respectively).

Confidence and Consistency

Can we really expect Forsberg to play with confidence and consistency when he plays so few games? Has no one else noticed he plays better as the game goes on and faces more shots? The same applies to Korpisalo; maybe he’d play more consistently if he didn’t have to play every game. If they alternated, it would create a healthy competition between the two, perhaps igniting confidence and consistency in both of them. Then, if one comes out on top significantly, you have determined your starter and backup.

Too simple?

photo credit

Behind the Bench with the Ottawa Senators

While some find it difficult to understand why it’s a coaching problem when a team is not performing well, others are quick to point the finger. That’s certainly been the dilemma in Ottawa with the coaching change behind the Senators bench. Was the issue the coach or the undeniably talented yet overpaid and underperforming players?

Personality Conflict

Sometimes players are not overly fond of their coach. That was not the case for the Ottawa Senators as DJ Smith had unwavering support in the dressing room right up until he was fired from the head coach position.

However, being friends with those you’re in charge of doesn’t work well very often. Like parenting small children, the adult in charge needs to create and enforce rules, with repercussions when they break them. It’s called discipline, something the Senators players lack.

Coaching Style

Hopefully, Jacques Martin will bring back the basics for the (relatively) young players with the more defensive and disciplined system he’s known for.

Avoiding, drawing, and killing penalties are teachable, disciplinary skills that the best NHL teams are much better at than the current Senators team. That’s not to say they can’t turn their bad habits around. That’s where effective coaching can help.

Daniel Alfredsson

This man can do no wrong in Ottawa. As our captain for many years, including our most successful ones, he is considered a hockey God here. His 2022 induction into the Hockey Hall of Fame proves his skill was recognized by not just Senator fans.  Behind the bench, as assistant coach he brings respect, knowledge, and play-by-play advice for players during the games. Not to mention the skill on the ice in practices. He has been referred to as “a beast” by the players, meaning at 51 years of age he can still compete with the younger generation.

Behind the bench

photo credit: Jonathan Milley of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, Commons Wikimedia id=2718058

Emotion Behind the Bench Can Be a Good Thing

Who else loved how both Martin and Alfredsson cheered when Angus Crookshank scored his first NHL goal? Both coaches show more (positive) emotion on the bench than any other coaches I’ve seen, including Smith.

While the players need discipline and repercussions for their lack of discipline, they also benefit from and are motivated by positive reinforcement from behind the bench.  

Moving Forward

After the exciting comeback against the Toronto Maple Leafs recently, both fans and players can envision what the team is capable of with the coaching changes behind the bench. Let’s hope this new strategy gets the Ottawa Senators on a winning streak!

Feature photo credit: Sportslogos id=20711586

Garbage Incineration: What are we Waiting For?

garbage incineration

Are you for or against garbage incineration?  I am a huge proponent of the theory and practice, so encouraged to hear it is being discussed here in Ottawa.

It has been proven to be efficient and successful in many advanced countries around the world, including Switzerland, Norway, Belgium, France, Denmark, and the USA. Canadian cities with success in waste-to-energy include Durham-York and Brampton in Ontario and Burnaby in BC.

The DYEC safely processes 140,000 tonnes per year of residential garbage that remains after maximizing waste diversion programs – reducing, reusing, recycling and composting – in Durham and York Regions.

Durham York Energy Centre

Canada’s Lagging Behind

Why then, if so popular in these other countries, is (most of) Canada dragging their feet with only a pitiful small percent of our trash sent for garbage incineration? We (some of us) are very focused on being the leaders in everything else, why not garbage incineration?

As our nation’s capital city, Ottawa should be leading the way with this proactive and modern technology. The use of dumps or landfills should be relegated to the history books, as the old-fashioned, inefficient relics they are.

MordorIntelligence offers the details on where Canada is on the waste-to-energy movement of which garbage incineration is the best-known method although it has its pros and cons. The biggest disadvantage is the pollution, for which there appears to be a solution:

  • To reduce particulate and gas-phase emissions, incineration plant owners have adopted a series of process units to clean the flue gas stream, which has, in turn, led to a significant improvement in terms of environmental sustainability.
  • Gasification of waste produces fewer emissions per unit of generated power compared to both incineration and landfilling.
  • The wide availability of technology, combined with a change in technology, is expected to lead to the increasing adoption of thermal-based WTE technology 
MordorIntelligence

Support for Garbage Incineration

I read in the Ottawa Lookout, a local newsletter, recently that a few of Ottawa’s councillors are proponents of garbage incinerators. The issue of Ottawa’s garbage dilemma was brought up at the city council due to the opposition to a proposed “bag & tag” policy. The problem with this policy is that it is simply a bandaid fix for the next decade or so until our landfills reach capacity:

Long-term planning is always a challenge in politics. The question is whether council does something about it now, or punts it down the road.

Ottawa Lookout

Ottawa Councillor David Brown expressed his support of garbage incineration in a recent newsletter, agreeing that the proposed bag & tag proposal is a bandaid fix, one that is very short-sighted. In an article in the Ottawa Citizen, Councillor Brown also discusses why he believes a waste-to-energy approach makes the most sense.

From another article in the Ottawa Citizen, I read the good news that, from a motion put forward by councillors Allan Hubley (Kanata) and David Brown (Rideau-Jock), the Council did vote to study garbage inceration, which is a big step in the right direction.

There was a good discussion around the Council table regarding the need to move forward on finding a better solution, one rooted in proven technology that is more responsible to taxpayers, the environment, and future residents. I am pleased to report that the motion was carried unanimously.

Councillor David Brown, Rideau-Jock

So now we wait. The ball is rolling though, let’s hope it catches more support. Read the information within the links above to learn the details behind garbage incineration. Our future depends on support from Ottawa residents.

The Cons: Cost and Pollution

Granted, the start-up cost involved in garbage incinerators is quite significant, but the advantages are also significant:

Senior officials with Varme Energy, a Canadian developer in waste-to-energy and bioenergy projects, outlined an Innisfail, Alberta project that will include a private investment of between 150 to $200 million for a new state-of-the-art plant on 13 acres of land …the completed plant would employ about 30 full-time jobs, including plant manager and power engineers. The construction and facility commission would take about 30 months and employ up to 125 workers. The competed facility would be a consistent source of municipal property tax revenues.

Western Investor

Varme’s facilities would be the first in Canada to both generate energy from waste, and to capture the excess carbon and store it underground, a process that’s been piloted in Norway, but has not yet been tested in Canada.

CBC News

Most investments in our future are expensive. I won’t even go into the astronomical amount of money we have tossed at solar and wind power initiatives.

A few other Ottawa councillors expressed concern about the pollution generated by incinerators. What about the pollution generated when disgruntled residents start tossing their garbage in the ditches if they have to limit the garbage put to the curb every two weeks? Don’t even get me started on that issue, I cannot believe in the hot summer months when maggots are feasting on garbage, we only get our trash picked up every two weeks.

I’m not suggesting pollution is not important but let’s look for a viable solution instead of voting for a bandaid fix. Surely there are new-and-improved, current waste-to-energy solutions out there that are less “dirty.” Whether we find a long-term, viable solution or start looking down the road, we should be thinking proactively.

Recycling and Garbage Incineration go Hand in Hand

No one is suggesting we cut back on our recycling efforts. In fact, according to Inciner8.com successful garbage incineration depends on vegetation, cardboard, household waste (no chemicals), and paper. Even plastic can be incinerated according to Nature.com, in fact, it burns the best. That’s great since our plastic use has doubled in the past five decades and is expected to double yet again within the next two decades! That’s a scary fact for everyone, regardless of whether you are on the climate change bandwagon or not.

Where do you stand on this important issue? Would you rather find a proactive solution or keep our heads buried in the sand or, in this case, in the garbage?